Members considered the Revised
Conduct Procedure Rules, Guidance and Templates report, presented
by Carol Pilson.
Carol Pilson drew members
attention to feedback received as part of the consultation process
(page 12 of the Agenda Pack). She informed members that their
comments made at the previous meeting had been incorporated into
the updated report.
Members asked questions, made
comments and received responses as follows;
- Councillor Purser
asked if the report is related to the Council’s 3Cs process.
Carol Pilson explained that the 3Cs process relates to general
comments made to the Council and in relation to the Council itself.
This report details the procedure of dealing with potential
breaches of the Members Code of Conduct.
- Members asked if
Carol Pilson could provide an overview of the proposed procedure.
Carol Pilson provided members with an overview of the revised
procedure and highlighted the differences between this and the
former process.
- Councillor Maul asked
if 7 working days is a suitable timescale for the Subject to
provide a response to a complaint and asked if there is flexibility
with this timescale (point 2.1.5 of the report). Carol Pilson
confirmed that the timescale is reasonable however, where required,
an extension of time can be granted to the Subject.
- Councillor Maul asked
if there were provisions in place in the event that the Independent
Person, Chairman/Vice-Chairman of Conduct Committee and the
Monitoring Officer disagree over the outcome of a complaint. Carol
Pilson highlighted that whilst this would be an unlikely event, the
Monitoring Officer has the ultimate decision.
- Councillor Topgood
highlighted that by having three individuals involved in the
process, it is unlikely that a majority decision would not be
made.
- Councillor Mrs
Wallwork asked for clarification on the Monitoring Officer’s
role in the previous process. Carol Pilson explained that
previously the Monitoring Officer had been involved in an advisory
capacity. The new procedure will allow quicker processing times of
complaints whilst maintaining public transparency by publishing
decision notices in relation to all complaints
submitted.
- Councillor Purser
asked what type of complaints the Council receives in relation to
members conduct. Carol Pilson explained that the Council receive
and consider a wide variety of complaints made against
members.
- Councillor Maul
praised the report and said the new procedure will reduce the
processing time of complaints significantly.
- Councillor Mrs
Wallwork agreed and highlighted that whilst the Code of Conduct
prevents members from publically making derogatory comments, it
does not prevent members from voicing their opinions.
- Carol Pilson
explained that many other Local Authorities include only the
Monitoring Officer and Independent Person in the preliminary
consideration of complaints however; she understands that members
are keen to have a political oversight of the process and the
Chairman/ Vice-Chairman of the Conduct Committee will now be
included in the preliminary stages.
- Councillor Maul
agreed and added that an impartial and unbiased approach must be
taken when considering complaints against members.
- Councillor Topgood
supported the report and stated that it will streamline the
complaint process and allow frivolous complaints to be settled
fairly and quickly.
- Councillor Topgood
added that the procedure will allow the Council to be open and
transparent with the complaints made against members whilst keeping
all parties updated on the progress.
- Councillor Topgood
invited the Independent Person, Stuart Webster to comment and he
thanked Carol Pilson for incorporating his comments into the final
report.
- Members congratulated
and thanked Carol Pilson and Amy Brown for their hard work on this
report.
Proposed by Councillor Purser, seconded by Councillor Mrs
Wallwork and AGREED that the Conduct Committee recommend the
Revised Conduct Procedure Rules, Guidance and Templates report to
Full Council for adoption.