Members considered complaints raised by Councillors Patrick, Lay and Clapp about the conduct of Councillor Tierney at a meeting of Wisbech Town Council on Monday 19 May 2014.
Councillor Hoy stated that she knew Councillor Tierney as they both served on Wisbech Town Council but that she would not let it affect her judgement as she would look at the complaint in a fair manner.
Alan Pain outlined the complaint and explained that the complaint was just for initial consideration which meant this was a chance for the committee to decide if the case meritted taking any further. The options open to Members were:
- Reject and give reasons why;
- Decide that case warranted further investigation;
- Refer the matter to further informal resolution
Councillor Skoulding asked if there was any way that the footage of the film recorded could be viewed as this would show how long the filming took place for and if the recording was carried out standing away from Councillor Tierney or in his face. Alan Pain explained that this could only be looked at if further investigation was asked for as the next step today. Councillor Skoulding stated he would like to see the footage as this would show if further investigation was required.
Councillor Sutton stated he had read the report and explained that on many occasions people had not adhered by the rules at meetings but when the Chairman lays the law down and the perpetrator obeys the Chairman's order then this would be finished with and was no big issue, therefore did not merit taking any further.
Ann Hay agreed with Councillor Sutton that the behaviour was bad manners. She explained that she had picked up that within the report there seemed to be some inconsistency in the fact that it mentions a Councillor Clarke, there was no Councillor Clarke present and that it also mentions a Government policy about being qualified to film, of which you do not need any qualifications. Ann Hay stated it seemed to be very "tit for tat" and very much like school children having a playground fight.
Councillor Yeulett stated this was a waste of committee time and tax payers money and that Councillor Tierney had summed it up in his final comment stating that as a councillor you open yourself up to public scrutiny and the fact that the Chairman asked him to refrain from filming and he did, in his view this should not be taken any further.
Councillor Skoulding stated that it was a lack of respect and that there was no policy adopted by Wisbech Town Council for filming so why did he use his phone, it should have been switched off. Councillor Hoy asked what part of the Code of Conduct did Councillor Skoulding think that Councillor Tierney had breached. Councillor Skoulding replied stating it was a lack of respect.
Councillor Russell stated he agreed with Councillor Skoulding that more respect should have been shown but that he felt the same way as Councillor Sutton in the fact that when asked to stop filming, he did and therefore that should be the end of it.
Councillor Sutton stated he went on the Wisbech Town Council website to see if anything was on there about phones and filming and the first thing that was drawn to his attention was that the Chairman conduct of the meeting is final and those concerned should abide by his decision; Councillor Tierney did that so he did not see any reason this complaint needed to go further. Councillor Yeulett supported Councillor Sutton in this statement.
Councillor Yeulett proposed to dismiss the complaint and that no further action was necessary; this was seconded by Councillor Sutton.
Councillor Sam Hoy stated she would take no part in the vote.
It was agreed that no further action would be taken.